Cracking Down: Canadian Court Emphasizes Compliance with Export Procedures

June 23, 2014

OVERVIEW

Over recent years there has been an increase in the enforcement of legislation aimed at businesses exporting their goods or services overseas. Recently, an Alberta company was fined $90,000.00 for mistakenly shipping $15.00 worth of prohibited equipment to Iran in contravention of the federal Special Economic Measures Act (the “SEMA”). The following is a general overview of that case.

FACTS

  • Lee Specialties Ltd. (“Lee Specialties”), an equipment manufacturer, entered into an export contract to ship various parts to a foreign company (the “Customer”) with offices in both the United Arab Emirates and Iran. Lee Specialties mistakenly addressed the shipment to the Customer’s Iran address.
  • The shipment had a total value of $6,000.00 and included $15.00 worth of 50 small O-Rings made of Viton, a synthetic rubber used in oilfield operations.
  • Under the SEMA, the shipment of Viton to Iran is prohibited due to Viton’s potential use in the production of nuclear energy.
  • Canada Border Services Agency officers inspected the shipment and discovered the prohibited Viton destined for Iran.
  • After learning of its mistake, Lee Specialties cooperated in a full investigation of its export procedures and eventually pleaded guilty to breaching the SEMA.

OUTCOME

The Honourable Judge Allan Fradsham of the Alberta Provincial Court considered the following factors when assessing Lee Specialties’ breach of the SEMA:

The potential harm that could have come about due to Lee Specialties breach of the SEMA;

  • The low value of the prohibited goods;
  • The fact that Lee Specialties’ breach of the SEMA was unintentional;
  • Lee Specialties’ cooperation with authorities after the breach was discovered; and,
  • Lee Specialties’ low risk of re-offending in the future.

Notwithstanding these factors, which one would think support the imposition of a small fine, the Court imposed a fine of $90,000.00 on Lee Specialties for breaching the SEMA.

IMPLICATIONS

The Lee Specialties case emphasizes that non-compliance with Canadian export requirements will not be tolerated, regardless of whether the breach was intentional or not. The hefty fine imposed demonstrates the vigour with which export laws will be enforced.

Judge Fradsham’s decision highlights the need for Canadian exporters to seek appropriate counsel and fully understand the nature and destination of the product being exported. The export landscape is complex and evolving constantly – Canadian exporters risk significant penalties if they fail to ensure all export requirements are met.

Related Articles

This Month in Nova Scotia Family Law – September 2025

Swimm v. Swimm, 2025 NSSC 247 Judge: The Honourable Justice Samuel Moreau Subject: Bifurcation of issues (Matrimonial Assets); Division of Matrimonial Assets; Inferences; Credibility; Sections 13 and 18 of the Matrimonial Property Act. Summary: The parties were married in April 2010 and separated in October 2023. Ms. Swimm filed a Petition for Divorce soon after. […]

read more

Navigating Director and Officer Liability

Being a director or officer of a company comes with many responsibilities – responsibilities that if not met are increasingly resulting in claims directly against directors and officers. This is true worldwide. In Global Insurance Law Connect 2025 Directors’ and Officers’ Global Trends report, it highlighted causes such as greater expectations by shareholders and increased […]

read more

Key Changes to PEI’s Powers of Attorney and Personal Directives

Written by Robin Aitken, TEP, Partner in Charlottetown What it is Substitute decision-making is what happens when a person is appointed by an individual (or by a court) to make or assist with decisions for that individual. Clients typically anticipate that this type of planning will be useful if they lose capacity to make decisions […]

read more
view all
Cox & Palmer publications are intended to provide information of a general nature only and not legal advice. The information presented is current to the date of publication and may be subject to change following the publication date.