Cracking Down: Canadian Court Emphasizes Compliance with Export Procedures

June 23, 2014

OVERVIEW

Over recent years there has been an increase in the enforcement of legislation aimed at businesses exporting their goods or services overseas. Recently, an Alberta company was fined $90,000.00 for mistakenly shipping $15.00 worth of prohibited equipment to Iran in contravention of the federal Special Economic Measures Act (the “SEMA”). The following is a general overview of that case.

FACTS

  • Lee Specialties Ltd. (“Lee Specialties”), an equipment manufacturer, entered into an export contract to ship various parts to a foreign company (the “Customer”) with offices in both the United Arab Emirates and Iran. Lee Specialties mistakenly addressed the shipment to the Customer’s Iran address.
  • The shipment had a total value of $6,000.00 and included $15.00 worth of 50 small O-Rings made of Viton, a synthetic rubber used in oilfield operations.
  • Under the SEMA, the shipment of Viton to Iran is prohibited due to Viton’s potential use in the production of nuclear energy.
  • Canada Border Services Agency officers inspected the shipment and discovered the prohibited Viton destined for Iran.
  • After learning of its mistake, Lee Specialties cooperated in a full investigation of its export procedures and eventually pleaded guilty to breaching the SEMA.

OUTCOME

The Honourable Judge Allan Fradsham of the Alberta Provincial Court considered the following factors when assessing Lee Specialties’ breach of the SEMA:

The potential harm that could have come about due to Lee Specialties breach of the SEMA;

  • The low value of the prohibited goods;
  • The fact that Lee Specialties’ breach of the SEMA was unintentional;
  • Lee Specialties’ cooperation with authorities after the breach was discovered; and,
  • Lee Specialties’ low risk of re-offending in the future.

Notwithstanding these factors, which one would think support the imposition of a small fine, the Court imposed a fine of $90,000.00 on Lee Specialties for breaching the SEMA.

IMPLICATIONS

The Lee Specialties case emphasizes that non-compliance with Canadian export requirements will not be tolerated, regardless of whether the breach was intentional or not. The hefty fine imposed demonstrates the vigour with which export laws will be enforced.

Judge Fradsham’s decision highlights the need for Canadian exporters to seek appropriate counsel and fully understand the nature and destination of the product being exported. The export landscape is complex and evolving constantly – Canadian exporters risk significant penalties if they fail to ensure all export requirements are met.

Related Articles

The Supreme Court of Canada’s Decision on Historical Child Support Awards

In the Supreme Court of Canada’s most recent family law decision, Michel v. Graydon, 2020 SCC 24, the Court settles a long-standing question about whether child support can be recalculated retroactively once a child has reached adulthood. The short answer is that child support is the right of the child and, with that fundamental tenant […]

read more

Employer’s Challenges and Obligations during the COVID-19 Outbreak

“With the combination of serious public health and economic impacts caused by COVID-19, employers are finding themselves facing unprecedented challenges”. The article Employer’s Challenges and Obligations during the COVID-19 Outbreak, written by Halifax Partner Geoff Breen & Halifax Associate Drew Ritchie, was published in the Spring 2020 edition of the Canadian Bar Association’s Nova Voce. Click here to read the full […]

read more

The Potential High Cost of a Small Claims Action

The recent decision of Justice Fred Ferguson, Mercure v Kaat Auto Sales, 2020 NBQB 39 (CanLII), (“Mercure v Kaat Auto Sales”) is another reminder to parties to think carefully before filing a Small Claims action in New Brunswick. Background In New Brunswick, a litigant can commence a Small Claim so long as the monetary amounts […]

read more
view all
Cox & Palmer publications are intended to provide information of a general nature only and not legal advice. The information presented is current to the date of publication and may be subject to change following the publication date.