The recent decision of Justice Fred Ferguson, Mercure v Kaat Auto Sales, 2020 NBQB 39 (CanLII), (“Mercure v Kaat Auto Sales”) is another reminder to parties to think carefully before filing a Small Claims action in New Brunswick.
In New Brunswick, a litigant can commence a Small Claim so long as the monetary amounts are under $20,000. The objective of Small Claims Court is to make accessing justice economical and user friendly. For example, the rules and procedure are somewhat relaxed as compared to higher levels of court. As was the case in Mercure v Kaat Auto Sales, often a party who is unsuccessful in Small Claims Court can simply appeal the decision. This is because the provisions of Section 20 of the Small Claims Act SNB 2012, c. 15, and associated regulations allow an appeal of the adjudicator’s judgment by way of a trial de novo, which means that the proceeding is repeated as a second trial. The aggrieved party can simply request an appeal, without needing to provide any basis or reasons as to why the adjudicator’s decision ought to be appealed. The only requirement is that the appeal must be made within 30 days after the filing of the adjudicator’s decision.
In Mercure v Kaat Auto Sales, the Claimant was unhappy with the performance of a 2013 Ford Edge purchased from Kaat Auto. The complaints were primarily with respect to the steering capabilities of the vehicle. Kaat Auto attempted to rectify the alleged issues. The Claimant was not satisfied and brought an action seeking to recover the cost for fixing various issues and the cost of travel, including his time.
The Claimant was successful in Small Claims Court, however, the Defendant appealed. The Claimant was therefore forced to attend an entirely new trial that lasted two days. At the new trial, both parties are free to bring different evidence and call entirely different witnesses. The Claimant was once again largely successful at the appeal.
Mr. Justice Ferguson, in postscript, aptly stated:
This case is another example of a system of adjudication of Small Claims that is out of sync with contemporary justice in Canada. […] [I]n New Brunswick a litigant can have two trials for claims under $20,000.00. If one side loses at trial […] that litigant can simply file an appeal without any cause and force the other party or parties to repeat the process […] Merit and cost have no part in the decision. Costs orders at the end of the second trial are seriously limited by statute.
A party who is considering commencing a Small Claim and wishes to engage legal counsel, may want to consider other avenues, such as the Simplified Procedure per Rule 79 of the New Brunswick Rules of Court.
The two main advantages to Rule 79 over a Small Claims action are:
Producers play a critical role in the music industry. A skilled producer can be the deciding factor between a track becoming a viral hit or fading into obscurity. Behind every successful record is a producer agreement that sets the foundation for the collaboration. Here are five practical tips for producers, and their managers, when negotiating […]
read moreCanadian trademark registrations last for 10 years and are renewable upon the payment of a maintenance fee. However, lack of use in the marketplace may render your registration subject to possible expungement. Traditionally, an application for trademark expungement was initiated by an interested person seeking expungement through the Canadian Trademarks Act. However, since January of […]
read moreOn June 23, 2025, we reported on our expectations for Nova Scotia’s new Mandatory Harassment Prevention Policy regulations. We are pleased to update that the long-awaited regulations were published on August 22, 2025 in the Royal Gazette Part II and will soon be added as Part 27 of the Workplace Health and Safety Regulations made […]
read more
