The Potential High Cost of a Small Claims Action

September 11, 2020

The recent decision of Justice Fred Ferguson, Mercure v Kaat Auto Sales, 2020 NBQB 39 (CanLII), (“Mercure v Kaat Auto Sales”) is another reminder to parties to think carefully before filing a Small Claims action in New Brunswick.


In New Brunswick, a litigant can commence a Small Claim so long as the monetary amounts are under $20,000. The objective of Small Claims Court is to make accessing justice economical and user friendly. For example, the rules and procedure are somewhat relaxed as compared to higher levels of court. As was the case in Mercure v Kaat Auto Sales, often a party who is unsuccessful in Small Claims Court can simply appeal the decision. This is because the provisions of Section 20 of the Small Claims Act SNB 2012, c. 15, and associated regulations allow an appeal of the adjudicator’s judgment by way of a trial de novo, which means that the proceeding is repeated as a second trial.  The aggrieved party can simply request an appeal, without needing to provide any basis or reasons as to why the adjudicator’s decision ought to be appealed. The only requirement is that the appeal must be made within 30 days after the filing of the adjudicator’s decision.

In Mercure v Kaat Auto Sales, the Claimant was unhappy with the performance of a 2013 Ford Edge purchased from Kaat Auto. The complaints were primarily with respect to the steering capabilities of the vehicle. Kaat Auto attempted to rectify the alleged issues. The Claimant was not satisfied and brought an action seeking to recover the cost for fixing various issues and the cost of travel, including his time.


The Claimant was successful in Small Claims Court, however, the Defendant appealed. The Claimant was therefore forced to attend an entirely new trial that lasted two days. At the new trial, both parties are free to bring different evidence and call entirely different witnesses. The Claimant was once again largely successful at the appeal.

Mr. Justice Ferguson, in postscript, aptly stated:

This case is another example of a system of adjudication of Small Claims that is out of sync with contemporary justice in Canada. […] [I]n New Brunswick a litigant can have two trials for claims under $20,000.00. If one side loses at trial […] that litigant can simply file an appeal without any cause and force the other party or parties to repeat the process […] Merit and cost have no part in the decision. Costs orders at the end of the second trial are seriously limited by statute.

 Key Takeaway

A party who is considering commencing a Small Claim and wishes to engage legal counsel, may want to consider other avenues, such as the Simplified Procedure per Rule 79 of the New Brunswick Rules of Court.

The two main advantages to Rule 79 over a Small Claims action are:

  1. Rule 79 offers an expedited procedure. There are no examinations for discovery and in many instances evidence can be presented at trial by affidavit; and,
  2. The losing party does not have an automatic right to a new trial.

Related Articles

The Supreme Court of Canada’s Decision on Historical Child Support Awards

In the Supreme Court of Canada’s most recent family law decision, Michel v. Graydon, 2020 SCC 24, the Court settles a long-standing question about whether child support can be recalculated retroactively once a child has reached adulthood. The short answer is that child support is the right of the child and, with that fundamental tenant […]

read more

Employer’s Challenges and Obligations during the COVID-19 Outbreak

“With the combination of serious public health and economic impacts caused by COVID-19, employers are finding themselves facing unprecedented challenges”. The article Employer’s Challenges and Obligations during the COVID-19 Outbreak, written by Halifax Partner Geoff Breen & Halifax Associate Drew Ritchie, was published in the Spring 2020 edition of the Canadian Bar Association’s Nova Voce. Click here to read the full […]

read more

Laying it All Out: Why Layoff Clauses Should be Included in Employment Contracts

In times of financial uncertainty, employers seeking to cut costs may quickly turn to temporary layoffs. From the employer’s point of view, layoffs offer an opportunity to press “pause” on its obligations to employees in the short-term while still maintaining the employment relationship in the long-term. Failing to handle layoffs properly, however, may leave the […]

read more
view all
Cox & Palmer publications are intended to provide information of a general nature only and not legal advice. The information presented is current to the date of publication and may be subject to change following the publication date.