What the Safe Food for Canadians Act means for fishers

November 18, 2014

What is it?

In 2015 the Safe Food for Canadians Act (the SFCA) will come into force and new regulations will follow. The SFCA and regulations will create a single set of food regulations and establish minimum safety requirements for all food imported or prepared for interprovincial trade or export. It will consolidate and replace a number of existing food laws administered and enforced by the CFIA, including the Canada Agricultural Products Act, the Meat Inspection Act, food provisions of the Consumer Packaging and Labelling Act and importantly, the Fish Inspection Act (the FIA) and the Fish Inspection Regulations (the FIR’s).

How the SFCA could affect fishers

With any consolidation of food laws, the impact on stakeholders is dependent on their place in the production chain and the nature of the product and market. The SFCA will have a greater regulatory impact on processors and brokers, but there will likely be changes to the compliance standards that will also impact fishers.

Many fishers are subject to one or more sections of the FIR’s which establish compliance requirements for vessels used for fishing or transporting fish (Schedule III) and for conveyances and equipment used for unloading, handling, holding and transporting fresh fish (Schedule V). The good news is that the government has indicated that certain commodity-specific requirements and processes will likely be maintained using the present approach and that it will publish new plain language compliance guides to accompany the new regulations. However, the government has suggested that the commodity-specific requirements could be re-written to streamline, consolidate and achieve specific outcomes.

What we know so far

At this point the good news is that the government has indicated that sectors currently under regulations which are already under CFIA oversight (ie. the FIA and FIR’s) will largely meet the proposed regulations, suggesting that the transition will be relatively straightforward and the changes minimal. However, it does look like change to some degree is coming. In its most recent overview the government provided some examples of specific requirements that are likely to be in the SFCA regulations:

  • Vessels – Provisions related to “onboard waste containment management” and “grandfathering” older vessels from certain current requirements;
  • UHHT – Specific requirements related to the holding and handling of fish during transportation and unloading;
  • Vessels/UHHT – Specific exemptions for fish, crustaceans undergoing minimal handling, and product not subject to processing and intended for delivery to a licence holder; and
  • Sport-caught fish – Issuance of certificates for sport-caught fish for export to the EU, even though the product is for personal use/consumption.

The federal government has indicated that a full draft of the SFCA regulations will be made available in January 2015 with a target date of June 2015 for final publication. Implementation will likely be phased in after that time. To what extent the upcoming changes will specifically affect fishers will only be known when the regulations are published this coming January, so stay tuned.

Related Articles

Significant Amendments Announced to the Accord Acts – Final Update

Written by Todd Stanley, KC, Managing Partner and Thomas Munn, Partner in Newfoundland and Labrador. Recent Developments Our July 2023 article Significant Amendments Announced to the Accord Acts outlined proposed amendments to the Atlantic Accord legislation. Our July 2024 article Significant Amendments Announced to the Accord Acts-Update detailed the arduous legislative journey of the proposed […]

read more

This Month in Nova Scotia Family Law – September 2025

Swimm v. Swimm, 2025 NSSC 247 Judge: The Honourable Justice Samuel Moreau Subject: Bifurcation of issues (Matrimonial Assets); Division of Matrimonial Assets; Inferences; Credibility; Sections 13 and 18 of the Matrimonial Property Act. Summary: The parties were married in April 2010 and separated in October 2023. Ms. Swimm filed a Petition for Divorce soon after. […]

read more

Navigating Director and Officer Liability

Written by John Boyle, Partner in Halifax. Being a director or officer of a company comes with many responsibilities – responsibilities that if not met are increasingly resulting in claims directly against directors and officers. This is true worldwide. In Global Insurance Law Connect 2025 Directors’ and Officers’ Global Trends report, it highlighted causes such […]

read more
view all
Cox & Palmer publications are intended to provide information of a general nature only and not legal advice. The information presented is current to the date of publication and may be subject to change following the publication date.