Changes to the Canada Labour Code

April 8, 2014

The Canada Labour Code, RSC 1985, c L-2 (the “Code”) applies to federally regulated employers in Canada. The following changes to Part III of the Code addressing Standard Hours, Wages, Vacations and Holidays came into effect on April 1, 2014:

New Complaint Mechanism

Prior to April 1, 2014, there was no formal complaint mechanism for filing a complaint in relation to unpaid wages or other amounts owing. There also was no formal complaint mechanism for filing a complaint in relation to other labour standard violations (other than a complaint of unjust dismissal).
There now exists a formal complaint mechanism for these complaints. The time limit for an employee to file a complaint under Part III of the Code has been limited to six (6) months. The time limit is calculated as follows:

  • For a complaint relating to unpaid wages or other amounts owing – six (6) months from the last date on which the employer was required to pay the wages or other amounts.
  • For a complaint of other labour standard violations – six (6) months from the date on which the subject matter of the complaint arose.

Note: the time limit for filing an unjust dismissal complaint (ninety days) remains unchanged.

Labour Program inspectors are now able to assist the parties in settling complaints. Inspectors may reject a complaint if it is frivolous, is outside the Labour Program’s jurisdiction, or can be resolved by other means.

Payment Orders

Payment orders for wages, or other amounts, are limited to twelve (12) months from the date the complaint was made, or twelve (12) months from the date of termination, whichever is longer.
Payment orders for vacation pay are limited to twenty-four (24) months from the date the complaint was made, or twenty-four (24) months from the date of termination, whichever is longer.

Administrative Review Mechanism  

There is now an internal administrative review process for an inspector’s decision.

  • An employer who receives a payment order or an employee whose complaint is ruled “unfounded” can, within fifteen (15) days of receiving the notification, request that the Minister review the inspector’s decision. The Minister may confirm, amend or overturn the inspector’s decision.
  • An employee who receives notification that his or her claim of unjust dismissal has been rejected can, within fifteen (15) days of receiving the notification, request that the Minister review the inspector’s decision. The Minister may confirm, amend or overturn the inspector’s decision.

What this Means for Employers

The changes to Part III of the Code limit the amount that is recoverable to an employee. The changes also introduce new time limits that should simplify the complaint process. The changes also eliminate the possibility of an order going back several years to when an employee was first hired. The changes should bring about greater efficiency to the complaints process and limit the quantum of employer liability in relation to a complaint.

Related Articles

Immigration Pathways for Students

The following interview was conducted by Feleshia Chandler and originally appeared on November 17, 2025 in My East Coast Experience. For many international students, the Post-Graduation Work Permit is more than a bridge to a career—it’s the first step toward building a life in Canada. Every year, thousands of international students choose Canada for post-secondary […]

read more

Catalogue Acquisition Deals

The following article was written by Matthew Gorman, Partner in our Halifax office, and originally appeared on SOCAN’s website on November 12, 2025. Years ago, an astute businessperson told me that you build assets to sell them. This conversation had nothing to do with music, but it always resonated with me. Fast forward to 2025, […]

read more

This Month in Nova Scotia Family Law – October 2025

Written by Jocelyne M. Campbell. KC,  Michelle Axworthy,  Paul B. Chudnovsky, and Thomas Blackburn, Family Law team in Halifax. McLean v Gonzalez, 2025 NSSC 313 Judge: The Honourable Justice Samuel Moreau Subject: credibility; division of matrimonial assets, parenting time, decision-making responsibility; determination of income for child support; retroactive child support Summary: The parties, married in […]

read more
view all
Cox & Palmer publications are intended to provide information of a general nature only and not legal advice. The information presented is current to the date of publication and may be subject to change following the publication date.