Terminations under the Canada Labour Code need not be for Cause

August 20, 2013

An employer dismissed its employee without cause and provided him with 6 months’ severance pay. A labour arbitrator decided that the employee’s allegation of unjust dismissal was made out because the Canada Labour Code (CLC) only permitted dismissals for cause. The decision of Redlon Agencies Ltd. v. Norgren, 2005 FC 804 (“Redlon”), was cited for this premise.

On judicial review of this decision, the Federal Court found that Redlon did not stand for the proposition that the CLC permitted only dismissals for cause. In Redlon, the Arbitrator determined that no entitlement of an employee to severance under the CLC does not mean that he or she cannot be entitled to compensation for unjust dismissal.

An employer under federal jurisdiction can dismiss an employee without cause under the CLC if it gives notice or severance pay (sections 230 and 235), but an employee can still complain that the dismissal is unjust (exceptions are: lay-off, discontinuance of a position and where another statutory remedy exists), and an arbitrator may additionally award a remedy within his or her broad remedial powers if one is merited.

The case was remitted back to a different arbitrator to determine whether the dismissal was just and whether a remedy would be appropriate.

Click here for a PDF copy of the Federal Court decision.

Related Articles

Immigration Pathways for Students

The following interview was conducted by Feleshia Chandler and originally appeared on November 17, 2025 in My East Coast Experience. For many international students, the Post-Graduation Work Permit is more than a bridge to a career—it’s the first step toward building a life in Canada. Every year, thousands of international students choose Canada for post-secondary […]

read more

Catalogue Acquisition Deals

The following article was written by Matthew Gorman, Partner in our Halifax office, and originally appeared on SOCAN’s website on November 12, 2025. Years ago, an astute businessperson told me that you build assets to sell them. This conversation had nothing to do with music, but it always resonated with me. Fast forward to 2025, […]

read more

This Month in Nova Scotia Family Law – October 2025

Written by Jocelyne M. Campbell. KC,  Michelle Axworthy,  Paul B. Chudnovsky, and Thomas Blackburn, Family Law team in Halifax. McLean v Gonzalez, 2025 NSSC 313 Judge: The Honourable Justice Samuel Moreau Subject: credibility; division of matrimonial assets, parenting time, decision-making responsibility; determination of income for child support; retroactive child support Summary: The parties, married in […]

read more
view all
Cox & Palmer publications are intended to provide information of a general nature only and not legal advice. The information presented is current to the date of publication and may be subject to change following the publication date.