New Brunswick Update: Notice Now Required to Sue a Municipality

July 25, 2018

On January 1, 2018, the Province of New Brunswick repealed the Municipalities Act and replaced it with the Local Governance Act. A section of this new Act requires that people who were injured in a place maintained or owned by municipalities, for instance the sidewalk, must now give notice to municipalities if they wish to bring an action against them for damages for personal injury.

This notice must be given within 90 days after the occurrence of the event. If plaintiffs fail to notify the municipality, they will not be able to claim damages for personal injury. There are some exceptions to this limitation period.  However it is still not clear if New Brunswick Courts will be lenient with this delay. Therefore, it will be crucial to respect the 90 days limitation.

Insurers should take notice of this change, as it will affect the issuance of a Third Party Claim against a municipality, should a municipality be potentially liable for a loss.  While a ‘waiver’ of defence might be obtained by an Insurer from a Plaintiff, in the case of a loss, such waiver will not apply to the issuance of an eventual Third Party Claim.  Accordingly, Insurers must now be that much more diligent in observing this limitation period for Notice to a municipality.

Related Articles

Future Care Costs for Cannabis in Personal Injury Claims

As a result of the Cannabis Act, cannabis was legalized on October 17, 2018. Prior to that, cannabis was regulated under the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act. There was, however, a legal exemption for the medical use of cannabis. Despite the recent legalization of cannabis, a framework for access to cannabis for medical purposes still exists, but under new regulations passed under the authority of the Cannabis Act.

read more

The Importance of Plaintiff Credibility in Determining Causation

A recent Nova Scotia Supreme Court case, Gale v Purcell, 2018 NSSC 319, demonstrates how the credibility of a plaintiff can play a central role in assessing causation in a motor vehicle accident. Background On September 19, 2006, the Plaintiff, Angela Marie Gale (“Gale”) sustained injuries in a motor vehicle accident (“2006 MVA”). On March […]

read more

Supreme Court of Canada Clarifies the Scope of Existing Duties of Care

In Rankin (Rankin’s Garage and Sales) v. J.J., 2018 SCC 19, the Supreme Court of Canada clarified how it will interpret existing duties of care, in the context of a personal injury arising from the theft of a vehicle stored at a commercial garage, and the evidentiary requirements for establishing novel duties of care.

read more
view all
Cox & Palmer publications are intended to provide information of a general nature only and not legal advice. The information presented is current to the date of publication and may be subject to change following the publication date.