Are You Ready to Comply with Canada’s Anti-Spam Legislation?

January 16, 2014

On December 4, 2013, the Minister of Industry, James Moore announced that Canada’s anti-spam law (the “Act”) will begin to take effect on July 1, 2014.  This announcement has arrived nearly 3 years after the Act received royal assent.  The finalization of the regulations under the Act triggered Mr. Moore’s announcement.

The Act will come into force in stages.  The spam provisions will take effect on July 1, 2014, the software provisions will take effect on January 15, 2015, and the private right of action takes effect on July 1, 2017.
The Act is aimed at encouraging growth and efficiency of electronic commerce by creating a scheme which eliminates conduct which would decrease confidence and trust in the on-line marketplace. The Act represents a “pro-consumer” response to unwanted electronic marketing schemes which invade our day to day electronic lives.
At the core of the Act is the general rule against sending commercial electronic messages unless the person sending the message has obtained the consent of the recipient.  As with most law, there are exceptions to the general rule.  The exceptions are found both in the Act and the regulations.  The key takeaway is that the general rule creates an “opt-in” system, putting the onus on the sender of a commercial electronic message to actively obtain the express consent of the recipient.  If express consent is not obtained, the sender of a commercial electronic message must then rely on implied consent or an exception to express consent.
The Act applies to the practice of sending commercial electronic messages (“CEMs”) which are electronic messages that encourage participation in a commercial activity by the text, hyperlinks, or contact information contained therein.  An example of a CEM would be an email soliciting business.  The Act also applies to the installation of computer programs in the course of a commercial activity.
Businesses that wish to engage in sending CEMs after the Act comes into force would be wise to start obtaining the consent of the individuals and business on its contact list.  After July 1, 2014 it will be more difficult to obtain consent through electronic communication as an email requesting consent would likely be considered a CEM.  This being said, there will be a transitional period after the Act takes effect in order to allow businesses to have enough time to bring their practices into compliance with the Act and regulations.  The transitional period will start when the Act comes into force and will continue for three years. During this time, consent to send CEMs will be implied in the case of certain pre-existing relationships (see section 66 of the Act).  The transition period will also apply to the installation of updates and upgrades to computer programs.  The transitional provisions will cease to apply if consent is expressly withdrawn.
Not only must a business have the consent of a recipient to send a CEM but the CEM must also have: (i) information identifying the person sending the CEM, (ii) contact information for the person sending the CEM, and (iii) an unsubscribe mechanism clearly and prominently displayed.
Some notable exceptions to the requirement for consent are available in the following situations:
  • The CEM is sent by a charity or political party
  • The communication is between businesses with an active relationship and the message concerns the activities of the recipient organization
  • Third party referrals for the first CEM
  • The CEM is sent due to a legal obligation or to enforce a legal right
  • If the sender and recipient are family or have a personal relationship
Consent may be implied in certain situations.  One notable situation of implied consent arises if a recipient has conspicuously published its electronic address which is not accompanied by a statement that the person does not wish to receive unsolicited CEMs.
Note that this is a law with serious consequences. A person who violates the anti-spam and software provisions of the Act (sections 6 to 9) will be liable to pay an administrative penalty.  The maximum penalty in the case of an individual is $1,000,000 and the maximum penalty in the case of any other person (e.g. businesses) is $10,000,000.

For more information on the Act, visit the Government of Canada’s Anti-Spam Website.

Related Articles

Addressing AI Bias and Discrimination: A Critical Path to Responsible AI

As artificial intelligence (AI) technologies become increasingly integrated into various aspects of our lives, the imperative to address AI bias and discrimination has never been more critical. These issues pose significant risks to privacy, human rights, and the equitable application of technology across society. This article explores the risks associated with AI bias and discrimination, […]

read more

The New Brunswick Accessibility Act: Potential Responsibilities for Employers

Earlier this year, new legislation was introduced into New Brunswick which recognizes the barriers to accessibility and the impact this has on persons with disabilities. The Accessibility Act[1] strives to achieve a more accessible New Brunswick by 2040. The purpose of the legislation is to identify, prevent, and remove barriers to accessibility by creating accessibility […]

read more

Corporate Governance: Legal Best Practices for Long-Term Success

In today’s fast-paced business environment, effective corporate governance is more critical than ever. Companies face an array of challenges that can impact their operations and reputation, including regulatory compliance, cybersecurity threats, and shifting market dynamics. Additionally, increasing stakeholder expectations for transparency and ethical practices require organizations to be agile and proactive in their governance strategies […]

read more
view all
Cox & Palmer publications are intended to provide information of a general nature only and not legal advice. The information presented is current to the date of publication and may be subject to change following the publication date.